Course-level
Assessing Critical Thinking in Capstone Courses:
A Roundtable Discussion Comparing Experiences & Setting Direction
Abstract
Capstone courses often develop students’ skill not only in a particular content
area but also in integrating learning from prior classes (e.g. marketing,
finance, and economics within a business curriculum).
While assessing students’ critical thinking skills within a single course
is certainly challenging, assessing integrative critical thinking skills—the
ability to draw upon prior course learning when exercising critical thought
within the present course—is still more so.
This roundtable discussion will afford interested parties the opportunity
to share their experiences in assessing integrative critical thinking skills
with the aim of developing more effective ways of assessing such skills in the
future.
Description
Most institutions of higher learning seek to advance critical thinking skills
among their students. This can be
pursued within a specific course—marketing, microbiology, mechanical physics—or
in a more integrative fashion wherein the objective is for students to draw upon
and synthesize learning across several courses.
Capstone courses often develop students’ skill not only in a particular
course but also in integrating learning from prior classes that span disciplines
(e.g. marketing, finance, and economics within a business curriculum).
While assessing students’ critical thinking skills within a discipline is
certainly challenging, assessing integrative critical thinking skills—the
ability to draw upon prior course learning when exercising critical thought
within the present course—
is still more so. It reflects a
higher-order skill and one that is in great demand.
As educators, it is incumbent upon us to improve our ability to develop
such integrative critical thinking skills within our students.
To do so, we need to identify how to best assess student mastery of these
skills. This roundtable discussion
seeks to provide a forum where interested parties may come together to share
their experiences in assessing integrative critical thinking skills and to
develop ways of more effectively assessing such skills in the future.
Let me confess to being a novice within the area of academic assessment.
As such, I do not pretend to offer to others prescriptions or recipes for
success in assessing integrative critical thinking skills.
My credentials are quite humble.
I recently coordinated assessment of the capstone strategy course within
the Steven G Mihaylo College of Business and Economics at California State
University, Fullerton. That’s it.
However, I have learned by doing and will share my experience and
insights as a means of launching the roundtable discussion.
I invite other participants to then share their experiences as well.
My brief investigation of this subject suggests that relatively little
attention has as yet been given to assessing integrative critical thinking
skills and how to develop these skills within students.
As such, I am organizing this roundtable discussion to enable those of us
teaching or administering capstone courses to collectively explore the notion of
integrative critical thinking skills and to address how to assess them.
Target Audience
College and University faculty teaching or administering instruction of capstone
courses who are interested in assessing students’ critical thinking skills that
integrate learning from prior coursework.
Learning Outcomes
Through joining in this roundtable discussion, participants should have:
learned how different disciplines and institutions assess capstone courses
clarified the role of integrative critical thinking within academic
assessment
identified the distinction between critical thinking and
integrative critical thinking for assessment
developed a network of contacts to draw upon when developing assessment
materials for integrative critical thinking within capstone courses
reflected on how the results of integrative critical thinking assessments
might be used to help faculty further develop pedagogical strategies across
the wider curriculum of the institution
Conducted by: